![]() You obviously can't turn off the computer. GPU +70✬ when opening windows Also, Sysinternals Process Explorer, a very nice GUI app, might work though malware that watches for Task Manager often watches for Process Explorer, too.vhdx file in Hyper-V Download Process Explorer use 'Find - Handle or DLL' then search for the filename. If there is another process or program locking the file you'll find it.This is what 2K calls "quality of life".Client hangs for several minutes on logout.implementing their launcher no one likes Like open Process Explorer and look at the full command lines used, there may be a way to bypass this shit launcher. A bit of a long shot but you can give a try. Dying.Light.2.Crack.Enhancement-EMPRESS Grab process monitor from and run it before lauhing the game.If you are lucky it might reveal something obvious. Some of your contributors are probably using WinXP too, such portability is hard to achieve blindly.Make sure to disable auto-scroll and also add a few filters before you clear the log, start its logging, THEN launch the game. Tried master branch, it builds too! #if (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0600) clause does it's job. Didn't even have to patch or configure anything. I've built 5.4.8 from sources with MSVC 2010. Which leaves us with threads, ntdll API and a mixed approach of using ntdll functions when they're available and threading API otherwise. ![]() Debugging requires considerably higher privilege level, which is not always available.We wouldn't be able to resume programs suspended by other methods.Some (if not many) programs utilize anti-debugging techniques, which would become angry and most likely immediately crash.I would reject "debug" method right away because: Would mean that these undocumented routines are actually more persistent and compatible than a lot of their documented counterparts, which became obsolete and unsupported already. I really respect these guys and suppose they know what they were doing.Īnd another reason would be the confirmed support of these functions in all Windows versions from XP and higher. However one strong reason is - SysInternals use them in their product. Not sure what happens if suspended with psutil and resumed with Process Explorer.Suspended with psutil (CPU usage 100%->0%), resumed with psutil (usage 0%->100%).Process suspended with Process Explorer (CPU usage 100%->0%), resumed with psutil - nothing happens (CPU usage 0%).It's started by conventional means and is running freely. Suppose we have a busy process with 4 threads, consuming 100% of a 4-core CPU. if the process is "suspended", but threads are "running", nothing is actually running. Looks like the process has it's own "pause" flag, which overrides the threads' flags. The process stays suspended without any errors. I recently committed some code (PR # (Windows) use PROCESS_QUERY_LIMITED_INFORMATION access rights #1376) which should definitively break win XP support but perhaps I may consider adding a workaround if psutil still (kind of) works on Win XP. how are you using psutil on Windows XP? What version is it? Last thing I knew about Windows XP support in psutil was that the binary wheels didn't work (because are compiled on Windows 7) but compiling from sources did.Point is figuring out what's the better method to use amongst those 3 As such it could be desirable to change it. These 2 links point out the risks of using the current method based on thread suspension/resumption (which I wasn't aware of). It seems there are at least 3 methods to achieve process suspend/resume.NtSuspendProcess and NtResumeProcess are not documented hence unofficial - not sure how big of a problem this actually is.What do you mean by "psutil cannot resume processes"? What happens when you do it (error?)?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |